"David Janes -- BlogMatrix" wrote... > Furthermore, I have no issues with debating and or changing the > nomenclature involved. For example, two or three days ago I explained the > options that were available to us for the various elements, the precedence > of HTML is using the word "title" or "heading" to mean "title" and why the > word "summary" is particularly ill-suited in the the blog world for > describing a title. (Direct responses: 0)
On my part, I didn't want to say, "I don't like it" without providing a particularly useful argument. I've been busy recently, but also I haven't felt very inspired as to alternatives, so I've been waiting to read something that would spark an idea to write about. So, I don't like using "title". I don't have a good alternative though, so I hope someone else chimes in with a brilliant idea that would make that statement worth the bytes it required to send across the internet. Atamido _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
