On 1/11/06, David Osolkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nitpickery: you forgot the rel="tag" in your rel-tags.
Doh. > >From the rel-tag microformats page: > > The linked page SHOULD exist, and it is the linked page, rather than > the link text, that defines the tag. The last path component of the > URL is the text of the tag, so > > <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/tech"; rel="tag">fish</a> > > would indicate the tag "tech" rather than "fish". OK, that answers my question. The last path segment of the @href is the tag's "term"; the part of the @href before the last path segment is the tag's "scheme"; the child text is the tag's "label". Nit: the rel-tag specification should probably say "last path segment of the URL" instead of "last component of the URL", to match the terminology of RFC 3986, section 3.3: "A path consists of a sequence of path segments separated by a slash ("/") character." This would also make it clear that tags can't be given in query parameters or fragment identifiers. (I don't have a problem with this restriction, but the language tripped me up until I dug far enough into the relevant RFCs.) I'd be happy to make this change on the wiki if there are no objections. -- Cheers, -Mark _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
