As you know, the structured blogging people have released plugins [1]
for MT and WordPress that generate microformatted output and, well,
structured blogging output.
I tried using their review generator and produced [2] which you can see
[2] doesn't quite get the encoding of the reviews correct.
I was going to send some comments to Phil Pearson about this but I'm
really not sure what the correct way to encode the review rating are. In
particular:
(1) are the sub-ratings (i.e. quality of service: 3/5) always going to
be dependent on rel-tag
(2) if it does ... where should the authority be for tags be? Is
"anything will do" the correct answer?
Regards, etc...
David
[1] http://structuredblogging.org/
[2] http://www.davidjanes.com/wp/?p=3
[3] http://tinyurl.com/behre
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
