On Jan 12, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
"Scott Reynen" wrote...
Paul Bryson wrote:
On the topic of hReview, I think it works really well with one
exception.
The "Rating" system seems woefully inadequete. I guess 1-5 is a
common
case, but certainly not 80%. There should be a machine readable
way to
mark
the upper and lower bounds of the rating.
There is.
"The rating is an integer from 1 to 5 inclusive indicating a
rating for
the item, higher indicating a better rating. Optionally a different
integral "worst" value and/or "best" value MAY be specified (e.g.
6 from
0-10)."
To clarify, there should be a better way. Specifically, a better
way to
mark the lower bound. I can't think that I've ever seen a review
that tells
you if the lower bound is 1 or 0. So, how do you provide that
information
without looking silly?
How do people provide it now without looking silly? Do they?
The currently used date-pattern allows the entire date/time including
timezone to be provided, all without overwhelming the reader. I
would like
to see a similar method.
Of course, we're using a specific, standardized time format here, so
there are different concerns.
-rk
--
Ryan King
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
