Lossy yes, but quite good enough to distingush it from the other Salems around the world. And (most importantly) the other two Salems in MA.
Paul On 1/17/06, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:27 PM, admin Yellowikis wrote: > > > Latitude and Longitude are a good example of a well established > > microformat: > > > > Salem, MA = <geo>42 31 17 N 70 53 44 W<geo> > > Um, actually, to be pedantic, that point does not represent Salem, > but some arbitrary point within it. So, converting from Salem to > those coordinates is actually lossy. I'm sure Kevin has more to say > about that, though. > > -ryan > -- > Ryan King > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > -- Yellowikis is to Yellow Pages, as Wikipedia is to The Encyclopedia Britannica _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
