Ryan King wrote:

.... Its those individual votes which are candidates for hreview, not the aggregate data.

Going off on a tangent from this point:  Why not?

I can identify some use cases where aggregate ratings data is published on web pages (http://www.google.com/reviews?cid=ba601666fe1a2e79&oi=showtimes&fq=star+wars, http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/poll?view=69043&pollId=69096 just to pick two completely at random). What microformat should I use to make this data more easily accessible? Seems to me that hReview is an appropriate starting point -- though it would certainly need fractional values and also some way to indicate weighting (something like "Based on <span class="weight">131</span> reviews").

Of course it's late and perhaps this is obviously nuts in some way. Please let me know.

--
John Panzer
Sr Technical Manager, AOL
http://journals.aol.com/panzerjohn/abstractioneer

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to