<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > I will pose this question on a few boards though, and see what others > think of this. As I understand it, your big concern is wondering whether > explicitly defining the bottom number is critical (my guess is YES, most > certainly). Secondarily, you are interested in what scale most prefer?
Well, I am primarily trying to figure out a way to present the information in a way that is easily parsable, and as part of that I would really like to include a lower end. Understanding how important the lower end (both in current usage, and desired direction) is to people is important to deciding how critical it is. As per microformat protocol, the primary source is what is currently being used, which appears to be the 1-5 inclusive scale. I would still be interested though in what people actually want as far as scales. Atamido _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
