Philip Pearson wrote: >>>>> Anyone know of any prior art? >>>> >>>> >>>> <link rel="alternate" type="application/xml" /> >>> >>> >>> Is that valid inside the HTML <body> block? >> >> >> No, but <a rel="alternate" type="application/xml">foo</a> is. >> >> RTFS: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#type-links. > > Excellent - thanks Mark and Ryan! I didn't realise that the "type" > attribute was valid on <a> elements.
In theory, you'd have to make sure that the <a rel="alternate"> didn't appear on index pages where there was more than one post, only on individual post archive pages (because it's saying that the linked page is an alternate representation of the current page).
Having said that, people use <link rel="alternate"> (wrongly) to link to their main site feed from individual post pages all the time, so you might get away with it.
alf. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
