On Jan 25, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Mark Rickerby wrote:
Sorry if some of you have already seen this, if not, I think it's
quite interesting...
Google's massive survey of text/html documents on the web:
http://code.google.com/webstats/index.html
Blogged, as well: http://microformats.org/blog/2006/01/25/google-
releases-web-authoring-statistics/
Of specific relevance to this list:
http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/classes.html
class="title" is the third most commonly used class, and
class="content" the 6th most, which could be significant in terms of
some of the recent hatom/hcard/hreview disambiguation discussions.
Certainly.
http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/element-a.html
It looks like only a tiny % of hyperlinks use the rel attribute, but
of those that do, that data is also interesting.
rel="nofollow" is *far* more common than anything else, but
rel="license" is surprisingly widespread too. rel="tag" is catching up
to rel="bookmark", though their commentary on this is a little
disparaging.
I assume you're refering to: "Web 2.0 collaborative remixability
social tagging" ? Yeah, a bit snarky, but I've seen worse. :-D
Though I do find their phrase "rampant bad UI" quite amusing, and
unfortunately all too true.
see also...
http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/linkrels.html
-ryan
--
Ryan King
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
