Thanks for the idea Shawn - i think sse could be the answer but i ideally there would be a microformat available i could use (i guess i'm just lazy!).

To clarify, if you think about Versioned-Documents, they will have a number of characteristics:
version number: 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 etc.
updated by: <person>
update date: <date>
status: draft, published, etc.
First version URI: The URI to the first document version
Previous version URI: The URI to the last document version
Version URI: where the document is


conceptually, the idea of a microformat to describe an individual document version is very cool

----Original Message Follows----
From: Shawn Carnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Microformats Discuss <[email protected]>
To: Microformats Discuss <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Versioned Documents
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:40:31 -0500

Tim Barker wrote:
Hi All - i'd appreciate your thought on how microformats can (or could) be applied to solving the problem i'm trying to tackle:

A lot of corporations have internal document management systems which are used to apply change and version control for (mainly) documents. Ironically, a large company will have around 8 different internal document managements, each focusing on a different type of document or process.

Seems to me that an RSS feed containg a microformat describing the document meta-data, version infomation and enclosed file would be the ideal way to distribute document meta-data and version information between different systems. I'm thinking that it would work in a similar way to hCard, with each document having its own meta data.
Would SSE <http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/rss/sse/> handle the versioning/sync issues? You'd still probably want a uf to describe the document meta-data, 'course.

Shawn


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to