Chatzilla uses tables, so I thought it was worth mentioning. As far as semantics, this is an excellent example of tabular data. Each row will have very specific pieces of information that can be broken down into specific columns meant to hold that data.
Styling is another matter entirely. Unless you start some fancy un-styling with the td's, you are stuck in a very strict basic layout. Using some other layout methods would certainly be more easily flexible in this respect. Atamido "Chris Messina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Uh. I'd like to give that a chance, since this is a fairly purposed discussion so I presume that you're being serious? The one thing that comes to mind as to why this approach wouldn't really make much sense is the sorting aspect... though I guess sorting by Nic/time would be ok... Even still, it seems no more semantic than my DL approach. Anyone else have opinions? Chris On 2/1/06, Paul Bryson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Chris Messina" wrote... > > I wonder than if we're going to be semantic purists and not use > > definition lists than what should we use? Ordered lists perhaps? I > > just don't think using paragraphs makes any sense, especially since > > each speaker very likely will have multiple paragraphs of prose. > > A table. One column for usernames, one column for what the user said. > Maybe another column with timecodes. Problems? > > > Atamido > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
