On 2/2/06, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Christopher St John wrote: > > ... > > Non-IRC conversations[1] are potentially much closer. > > > > [1] http://kitta.net/2006/02/01/i-am-heartbroken/ > > Not to be pendantic, but that actually *is* an example of an IRC > conversation. Don't let the cute girl fool you. >
My thought was that although the source of the data might have been an IRC/IM chat session, it was being presented in the same way a phone or in-person conversation might be presented. I suspect there's a more general "conversation" principle at work somewhere here, which is one of the reasons I like the microformats way : it's ok to not do something general. Should it go up on the examples page, maybe with a note saying that some think it's an edge case? -cks -- Christopher St. John http://artofsystems.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
