On 2/2/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/2/06 1:57 PM, "Christopher St John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Other spec processses: review existing specs and usage of those specs > Microformats: FIRST review existing usage on the web. > Microformats places existing usage ABOVE existing specs, and this is a very > important difference from other spec processes. >
Fair enough. But easy to say, and hard to do, and around here it does seem to get done. > However, there are plenty of people at W3C and IETF etc. that take their > respective processes quite seriously as well. I don't think you inteded a > slight there, but I just want to be clear that no such slight should have > been intended. > Having particpated (at one level removed) in a big-name spec organization process, I can say with absolutely certainty that it never entered my mind to doubt how seriously the spec process can be taken. -cks -- Christopher St. John http://artofsystems.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
