That's great, thanks for the feedback guys.
Chris
Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 2/2/06 10:57 AM, "Ryan King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Chris Roos wrote:
Hi,
I have a specific question regarding the parsing of the hreview on
this yahoo movie review[1]
The rating given in the review is as follows
<dt>Rating</dt>
<dd>
<em>3.5/5
<img src='http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/i/eu/mov/
35onw.gif' width='71' height='14' alt='3.5 stars' border='0'>
</em>
</dd>
My initial impression is that this is invalid based on hreview
rules but I'd like to be sure, so if anyone can shed any light I'd
be most grateful.
... At least, there is no rating.
Right. It's not that it's "invalid", the markup itself certainly is not in
error.
However, the rating is simply not marked up and thus won't be recognized as
part of the hReview.
Note that the rating uses a single decimal point of precision (as apparently
many real world examples do), and thus can't be marked up in hReview 0.2
accurately.
Thus we are adding a decimal point of precision to hReview 0.3.
http://microformats.org/wiki/review-brainstorming#hReview_0.3_thoughts
Thanks,
Tantek
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
