> > The summarised notes from the hCal meetup are available here > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-irc-meetup-20060225 > > Thanks for posting these. Unfortunately I was unable to make it to the IRC > meetup.
It would have been great to have a few more people attend, but I think the meeting did go pretty well. > > The items for discussion were posted to > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-issues as soon as I was made > > aware that this was the correct place to put them, which unfortunately > > was just before the scheduled time. The questions have been available > > for over a week at > > http://www.lifelint.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/01/hcalendar-agenda-20060 > > 225.html > > I believe there are good answers (either explicit or implicitly defined in > the current spec) to most of these issues, and I'll go through them, and > answer as many as I can, perhaps moving some to the FAQ. The agenda was just a starting place for the meeting and I think it has served its purpose. I think there would be more value in looking at the notes: - http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-irc-meetup-20060225 and giving your 2c on the issues - http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-issues and them roll them into the FAQ/Spec > > The main implication from the meeting is that the vcalendar class > > seems redundant. > > For now, see "Note 2" on the Example in the spec. > > Ah, I see the source of confusion now. It looks like some damage done by a > vandal, change 07:53 6 Jan 2006 by Serginandr, was not undone unfortunately, > and thus part of "Note 2" was hidden (it was a markup example). I'll go fix > it. Brian Suda and I had quite a lengthly discussion on this topic. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on our disucssion (either agreeing or disagreeing). Mark _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
