Right. Note that I'm very much pro-reuse. I'm just looking for the right "mash up" of formats to represent this data to make a meta-format... a combination of multiple microformats to describe something like group behavior/membership. I.E. "to bring it all together".
So so far we've got rel-directory, xfolk, xfn, hcard, cite-rel... and it does look like a few extra rel values might be enough to "claim" your membership in a group or be listed as a member. Chris On 2/27/06, Eran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To describe threaded conversations I use cite-rel - > http://microformats.org/wiki/cite-rel > To show that those discussions belong in the group, each post uses > rel-directory. > > Eran. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg > > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:38 AM > > To: Microformats Discuss > > Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Group Microformat > > > > Seems to me like describing the group meta-info (i.e. the > > group info + its membership info) is something different than > > describing the threaded conversation that may happen in a group. > > > > > > -josh > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
