On 04 Mar 2006, at 13:50, Ryan King wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Alf Eaton wrote:
At postgenomic.com (an aggregator/analysis engine for life science
weblogs), an attempt to get people to add markup to their posts to
identify reviews of papers currently looks like this: <http://
www.postgenomic.com/about_reviews.php>. The recommendation is to
use either a) rev="review" on the outward link, or b) to enclose
the review in <div class="hreview"> and add class="url" to the
outgoing link. My question is that in the hReview draft
specification, 'item' is required: would it be best to use <div
class="hreview item description"> for the wrapper, or are 'item'
and 'description' not really necessary in this context (where
there's not always structure, such as citation metadata, in the
review itself)?
In this case, the url would be the item being reviewed, no?
Yes, it would. The trouble is that the item (title, url) and
description (the text of the review) are all going to be jumbled up
here, so it's difficult to isolate them into separate 'item' and
'description' sections. Could it be implicit that a 'url' class
inside an 'hreview' class refers to the item being reviewed?
alf.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
