On 3/5/06 6:08 PM, "David Beach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think XML could be sufficient. But if it is, then why hasn't any of > this been done? Indeed, it's been tried, but more with idealistic formats that attempt to capture all information about something, rather than empirically based 80/20 formats that only attempt to capture *most* of the information people are already publishing. This really gets at the heart of how microformats are different from traditional format efforts. > I'm going to ETech this week. If any of you all are going to be > there, it would be interesting to meet up and discuss. David, I'm going to be there as are several other microformats folks, especially for the microformats panel on Tuesday. Take a look at the page on our wiki for the event: http://microformats.org/wiki/events/2006-03-07-etech-microformats and add yourself to the "Attending" section. Hope to see you here! Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
