The categorisation does make navigation simpler. I don't want to sound like the wiki police, but it may be worth while to specify the order in which items are added to a list. i.e. newer items at the top/bottom of lists, alphabetical, etc.
Mark On 3/10/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In an attempt to make it easier for folks to find particular types of > implementations for each microformat, I have organized the "Implementations" > section of the hCalendar specification into what feels like a decent best > first guess at categories of implementations that people may be interested > in for various purposes: > > * Authoring > * Browsing > * Converting > * Libraries > * Potential (typically open source projects we'd like to add support to) > > Some of those have subcategories also. > > Take a look and let me know if this makes sense, if it is better than just a > flat list of implementations, etc., and if you have any suggestions for > improvements > > If folks this is a good idea, then we can proceed to update the > Implementations sections of the other specs accordingly. > > The goal here is to make it *easier* for folks reading the microformats > specifications to find tools/libraries to do stuff with microformats. > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar#Implementations > > Thanks, > > Tantek > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > -- picking the lint off your life _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
