I wonder, how many, or what percentage,of people are required to make a particular microformat endeavor worth devoting space on a wiki, and the effort of others to review?
I don't personally care that much about plants on the web, but I do find the idea interesting. And being ADD, that at least ensures a little attention to the proposal from me. Honestly, I think that if this person is motivated enough to complete all of the work himself, with only minor guidance from those on the list, there isn't any reason to disallow it. It certainly isn't going to garner front page attention any time soon, but it is complete and useful, it could. Atamido "Ryan King" wrote... I understand that there are some people, for whom, plants are an important part of the Web for them. But, for me (and I suspect many others), there are a hundred more important things to work on. We already have a number of microformats, in many states of completeness. I'm going to focus my energy on those– building tools and test cases for them, explaining them to people and building consensus around them. I can't speak for others' time, but mine needs to be spent on more pressing matters. And I could use help on them. Lots of help. (hint, hint, nudge, nudge) Also, on a related note, we need to be very careful about creating new microformats– remember microformats are not appropriate for every use case. -ryan _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
