Probably get it going on an attention-brainstorming page... The most traction you're likely to get is mashing up existing microformats to represents snippets of attention -- rather than creating a monolithic way of expressing attention. But that's my layman's understanding of this problem, which probably isn't all that insightful. ;)
Keep us posted -- it's certainly something that I'm interested in seeing worked on, even if it's unclear whether attention really can be microformatted. Chris On 3/30/06, Nick Swan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks for the replies... > > well as I mentioned I'm busy working away on an attention based application > and am keen to use a standard that means data can be exchanged with others. > > What's the best way to get this going again? I've an idea of the data we'd > like to store. Is the best thing to do to just post my thoughts here and we > see where it goes? > > Cheers > > Nick > > > > > > On 3/30/06, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris is right. The attention.xml effort has been a bit stalled. It > > had initially started as a Technorati initiative, but we'd like to > > move it to microformats.org. However, as we were moving it, we > > realized that it actually doesn't follow many of the microformats > > principles. So, discussion has started about how to make it more > > 'microformat-y'. > > > > -ryan > > > > On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Chris Messina wrote: > > > > > I think this discussion stalled because it was hard to bake the > > > "micro" of "microformats" into attention data... I could be wrong -- > > > but since no one else responded, just thought I'd chime in that I'm > > > not sure any more work has been done recently on that format -- and > > > I'm not clear who, if anyone, is driving it anymore. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > On 3/30/06, Nick Swan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> first message to the emailing list after attending the > > >> microformats and > > >> structured blogging session with Marc Canter and Tantek at Mix06. > > >> > > >> I'm interested in using the attention microformat for an > > >> application I'm > > >> working on, and so am seeking clarification as to where this format > > >> currently is. Checking the wiki entries on the microformat page it > > >> seems as > > >> though initial discussions began, but didn't get much further: > > >> http://microformats.org/wiki/attention > > >> > > >> Checking on the Technorati wiki there is some more information and > > >> even a > > >> sample in microformat: > > >> http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/attentionxml > > >> sample: > > >> http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/AttentionSample > > >> > > >> Is this the format that people are currently using who are working on > > >> attention applications? We are keen to use a standard format so to > > >> allow > > >> people to move their attention data from one service to another, > > >> so would > > >> really appreciate any pointers > > >> > > >> Many thanks > > >> > > >> Nick Swan > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> microformats-discuss mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > microformats-discuss mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > > > -- > > Ryan King > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > microformats-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
