On 4/10/06 11:37 AM, "Scott Reynen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When someone looks at the hcard pages and sees no > collection of real-world publishing of contact data nor discussion of > the properties implied by such examples, I think it's far too easy to > infer that microformats come from other formats more than actual > behavior. There's nothing on the process nor the hcard pages > explaining this discrepancy. I would argue that there should be an > explanation, probably in both places. Certainly such explanations wouldn't hurt. Please add this to hcard-issues so we make sure it is handled. http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-issues > If design patterns don't > follow the process, I would argue that this distinction should be > clearly documented and explained. We can at least begin to document how patterns pages are different. I've started a bit of a write-up here: http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Patterns Perhaps Ryan or someone else who has worked on one of the existing patterns can add more thoughts. Hopefully with iteration and constant improvement we'll get to that goal of having the "distinction be clearly documented and explained". For now, we will settle for some documentation is better than none. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
