Christopher St John wrote:

anything is possible :-)

Excellent. Heartwarming optimism :)

the traditional advice at this point would be to
start getting together a set of examples-in-the-wild
of the sort of thing you're talking about, and let
the examples guide the thinking...

What would it be interesting to see ... the way the podcast transcript is represented in the XML, or the HTML (which is currently *horrible*, and going to change soon)? Or both?

Would it be appropriate to add this to http://microformats.org/wiki/chat-examples under a tentative "*might be relevant to chat*" "podcast transcripts" heading?

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/lists.html#h-10.3,
yeah, i know, it actually says, right there in the
4.01 spec, that DL's might be used to mark up
dialog, but dialog isn't a definition, is it? i
don't like it. but that's just me.

I agree entirely. Think it very odd and reckon <cite> and <q>/<blockquote> more appropriate. Don't understand the dl suggestion at all.

<tangent>Would it be correct to use hCard for the people in a transcript, or am I jumping the gun/plain wrong?</tangent>

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to