David, it appears you may have missed my email from this morning: "[uf-discuss] UID, URL, live microformats (was: Microformat auto-discovery WAS: Plazes & Microformats)"
<http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-April/003726 .html> In short, we don't want a vocabulary explosion of rel-**** per microformat (that's an antipattern) and URL + UID solves this problem quite elegantly without introducing any terms at all. Reply to the above thread to follow-up, not this one. Thanks, Tantek On 4/19/06 2:06 PM, "David Janes -- BlogMatrix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ryan King wrote: >> But the relationship isn't 'vcard'. 'vcard' describes the format (or >> part of the format) of the referenced resource, not the relationship >> between the two. > > OK, fair enough: vcard is just a word, and in particular > [top-level-uf-id] is just a word. But because we're devising these names > to be unique under almost all circumstances, I don't think it's confusing. > > Would your objection disappear it to be 'is-canonical-vcard'? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
