Off List because off topic
Le 06-04-27 à 20:16, Steven Livingstone a écrit :
RSS (as an example) has remained very simple ever since it was
created and
XML-RPC has also remained so along with many others. Sure, there
have been
and
In contrast if you consider RDF, OWL etc - they are not
particularly easy to
get running with. There is quite a learning curve, but having used
them for
Unrelated. You do not compare the same thing at all :)
You could compare an
application of RDF
Ex: FOAF, SKOS, RSS 1.0
with
an application of XML
Ex: XHTML, RSS 2.0, Atom
The first paragraph of Uche Ogbuji's IBM article sums it up for me:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-stand2.html
Put this first paragraph in the SGML community, and you will see the
answers. Everything is a question of context.
It's certainly nothing specific to Microformats, but more a web 2.0
view on
things where simplicity is being particularly effective.
Web 2.0 is a marketing which became a social phenomenon. Not a
technology.
Microformats are good for particular things. I didn't say the
opposite. They have their issues and their benefits depending on the
context.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
