Might be worth considering any format that captures historical data... Ie who did/said what.I remember someone talking about movie scripts having a specific format with semantics... That was being referenced in the chat transcript discussion.
I mean, the framework of what we're talking about is people having conversations with one or more speakers. in this application of that framework, there are decisions, key points, decision points, requests for follow up or addit'l info, and assignments and/or tasks (possibly more). Point is, there is a larger need here that could be informed by formats outside the 'meeting minutes' space -- that have already been documented on the wiki. In any case, very excited to see this work unfold. Chris On 5/3/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/06 12:19 PM, "Scott Reynen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 3, 2006, at 1:43 PM, brush wrote: > >> one thought about "role": is it appropriate to re-engineer the >> category >> from what is apparently originally intended as a relatively static >> feature (ie. "sales engineer" for a person or "green construction" for >> an organization) to something relevant only in the immediate context >> (ie. "notetaker" for a specific meeting, or "abstain" for a vote)? > > It looks to me like "role" in vCard and hCard means what "role" in > English means. I would say "notetaker" is a role, but "abstain" is > not. I agree with Scott. > Maybe "abstainer" could be a role, but it would need to be > defined within a very specific context, unless you're describing > someone who just goes around abstaining all day. I think roles need > to be nouns, not verbs. Agreed with this clarification as well. Thanks Scott, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
