On May 12, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Paul Bryson wrote:
I poked around and didn't see any mention of these anywhere. Is
there a defined method to use for footnotes? This seems closely
related to Citations where there appears to be some mention of
annotations, but doesn't seem to be exactly correct.
I had a page that I helped someone out with, and I thought I would
mark it up properly, but I can't find a way it should be done.
http://files.commo.de/annotation-fixed-appear.html
Here's what I see in the archive:
On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Ryan Cannon wrote:
John Gruber uses Footnote citations on his daringfireball.net,
which would probably make a good example of citation markup in the
wild:
<p>I’ve been experimenting with the use of footnotes here on
Daring
Fireball over the last few months.<sup id='fnref1-2005-07-20'><a
href="#fn1-2005-07-20">1</a></sup> ... </p>
<div class="footnote">
<hr />
<ol>
<li id="fn1-2005-07-20">
<p>E.g. “<a href='/2005/03/font_caches_gone_wild'>Font Caches
Gone Wild</a>”.
<a href="#fnref1-2005-07-20" class='footnoteBackLink' title="Jump
back to footnote 1 in the text.">↩</a></p>
</li>
...
</ol>
</div>
On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
Also spotted in the wild on Alex King's website:
http://www.alexking.org/blog/2006/01/24/email-signature/
Chris
Is there a semantic difference between annotations and footnotes?
Might want to take a look at what flickr is doing with photo
annotations, e.g.:
http://flickr.com/photos/strangelittlegirl190/144760276/
Peace,
Scott
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss