I think in order to validate, you need to supply at least the 'n' value, even if the screenname is not the actual "name":
<li class="vcard"><span class="n nickname">ChattingChuck</span></li> On the other hand, I don't know if you *should* mark up those fragments as hcards given the 'n' requirement... I think it's good to be semantic to the last drop, but I think Tantek's advice on this issue would help: how little data can substantiate hcard markup? Chris On 5/23/06, John Panzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All, I have a use case for displaying lists of people (readers of a blog) which seems reasonable to mark up using XOXO and hCard. However, in at least some of the cases the only piece of information I have about a user is their login ID, which is an AOL/AIM 'screen name'. Is this a reasonable minimal hCard markup for these cases? <li class="vcard"><span class="nickname">ChattingChuck</span></li> Two questions here: (1) is "nickname" the right way to say this and (2) is this sufficient to be a reasonable if minimal hCard? Thanks, John Panzer _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
