Hi all,
I apologize if this might be off-topic, but I'm honestly curious and
would like to understand this better:
http://www.bnode.org/archives2/58
eRDF:
(+) follows the microformats principles
http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml
From my admittedly naive perspective, eRDF looks like it *could* be
used in a way that is compatible with microformats. That is, not
*all* eRDF schemas and documents *are* necessarily microformats, but
many of them _could_ be. Conversely, it seems like _most_
microformats could be described using eRDF schemas.
Is that true? If so, what is the dividing line?
-- Ernie P.
P.S. For what its worth, this seems _way_ more promising to me than
RDFa.
------------
Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. <drernie at opendarwin.org>
Ex-Physicist, Marketing Weenie, and Dilettante Hacker
Probe-Hacker blog: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
