Perhaps ironically, I would think that the "discussion log" portion
of meeting minutes maps to hAtom.
I've done a pretty exhaustive search on the history of VJOURNAL and
hCalendar, and it looks like it was brought up last December by
Tantek for consideration as a blog post format, and the WikiRemnants
remain: <http://microformats.org/wiki/blog-post-formats#VJOURNAL>
Later, at the end of February Ryan added "make sure we explicitly
disallow 'vjournal'" to the hCalendar page, but I can find no traces
of a discussion around that. Perhaps there was an IRC session?
I'm concerned that a "let's consider VJOURNAL for blog posts" -> "no,
Atom entries are better" -> "alright, kill VJOURNAL" path was
followed that never gave poor vjournal a chance to stand up and
defend itself as a description of moments that should not be
described as "published."
Of course, I'm the new kid on the list, so I'm likely missing something.
- - -
Hans Gerwitz
hans.gerwitz.com
On Jun 2, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
Hmm, while we're discussing this, you might look at the meeting
minutes discussion as I believe that there's much to be gained from
cross-polinating the discussions...
Just as meeting minutes need to capture the who and what of a moment,
so too do you want to capture similar things, with the addition of geo
info (which could be an optional aspect of meeting minutes, for
example, if a speaker is jacked in over Skype in another locality).
http://microformats.org/wiki/meeting-minutes-brainstorming
Chris
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
