Hello everyone,

First, I'm assuming here that you all know FACE: http://kurafire.net/ projects/face — if not, please check that out so you know what I'm babbling about below.

Now, I've been thinking about the next release version for a long while and one of the things I want to improve is the current implementation of id and class attributes, used to trigger and configure FACE, respectively.

The Microformats approach of using the title attribute for certain data intrigued me. Since FACE runs through a series of classes for an animation, the class attribute with the configuration for FACE is overwritten if the animation is set to run on that element (instead of its children elements, which is the other option).

My question to you fine people is: are there any good reasons why I shouldn't change this around so that the configuration is put on the title attribute instead?

The only disadvantage I see is that without clearing the title attribute after fetching the data from it would leave the tooltip with totally un-tooltip-like data (it would be something like title="C:foobar:40:MO:50:50" for instance).

Other than that, it seems like a fine solution to me _and_ (slightly more) in the spirit of Microformats.

Your thoughts please! :-)

Cheers,
Faruk

--
Web Kaizen Specialist
www.kurafire.net


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to