Michael MD wrote: >> Thanks for informing me of the eventual decision - it is appreciated. >> I'm glad you've gone for the shortened version too. >> >> > > what was the decision? ... missed it.... > --- There wasn't much of a "decision", but more of a best-practices. Previously X2V was padding all dates with a time. If you look through the RFC there are a few examples where the start date is simply just a date (20060613), but X2V was converting that to 20060613T000000, which isn't incorrect.
I have started to refactor the code and in doing so i am trying to minimize the number of "assumptions" i am making. So padding the date unnecessarily is something that got cut-out. If the hCalendar owner wanted the time padded, then they can put that in their code themselves otherwise if the data is valid, it should be kept the way the author intended. -brian _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
