I'm primarily interested in combining tasks -- I submit microformats to Pingerati and it tells me if they're A-OK or not. Seems like a logical 2 step process -- even though I take your point about orthagonalizationalism. ;)
On 6/13/06, Kevin Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 13, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Chris Messina wrote: > It would be interesting if the Pingerati infrastructure offered a > validation service -- or revealed mal-formed microformats. A validator is orthogonal to pingerati, but if someone puts one togtether I'll happily feed it pings. > Similarly exposing this data coming into Pingerati would potentially > give mF advocates something to do on the weekend. Heh. (Or at least > tell the authors of the pinged page that there's something the > matter). There is a difference between a liberal parser and a validator, is the point. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Chris Messina FactoryCity Foreman & Open Source Ambassador-at-Large Work / factorycity.net Blog / factoryjoe.com/blog Cell / 412 225-1051 Skype / factoryjoe This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
