On Jun 13, 2006, at 3:11 AM, Ryan King wrote: > On Jun 11, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > On 6/11/06 6:11 PM, "Steve Ganz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In the hResume draft, it is written: > >> > >> Schema: > >> > >> * contact info. required. <address> + hCard. > > > > How about: > > > > * contact info. required. MUST use hCard. SHOULD use <address> + > > hCard. > > In the case where the author is *not* using an <address>, we > lose the semantic of "this is the hCard for the author of > this page". I don't think it would be a good idea to make all > hCards in an hResume apply to the author. > > > ? > > > >> Field Details: > >> > >> * contact:: Current contact info. The <address> with hCard. > > > > How about: > > > > * contact:: Current contact info in an hCard. SHOULD use > <address> if > > possible. > > > > ? > > > >> Does the above mean an hResume author MUST use the > <address> element > >> to mark up the authors hCard? > > > > It's not clear, nor was that intended by the authors, thus > we should > > clarify it. > > I agree that its not clear, but I actually intended it to be a MUST. > Of course, I'm open to that changing, though. > For the time being, I've updated the wiki with Tantek's suggestions. Hopefully it will create a spark for people to come up with some solutions for this problem. In the meantime, I looked at the existing Examples in the Wild. It looks like a pattern is developing where people are using the <address> tag somewhere inside thier "hCard" to mark up either the "adr" or some other specific chunk of contact info. Knowing that, maybe it's the other way around. How about... Schema: * contact info. required. Must use hCard that contains an <address>. And... Field Details: * contact:: Current contact info. An hCard that contains an <address>. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
