On 7/10/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<span class="location"><a href="#scandinaviah" class="include" type="text/html-frag">Scandinavia House</a> I think this may be another legitimate use of "includes" - to replace abbreviated local content with a more extensive chunk from another location. What do folks think of this usage?
This idea seems pretty potent -- I just wonder a) whether normal folks will ever use it (especially in the blogger/individual sense -- or else everything would need to be linked to a more filled out description in blog posts... I guess the question of when you link to the expanded version could become a small matter in the case of inconsistent judgment; b) that finding the authoritative reference for expanding the link could be difficult -- especially if content on the other end changes or is malformed. The issue here, perhaps, is to what degree parsers should trust or rely on remote information when it comes across such includes. Should it treat it as local content, as PHP and ASP and other scripting languages do? --or should it be treated as an untrusted source of information? Chris _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
