Well, yeah. Adding a tag to an irrelevant word is somewhat counter intuitive, since tags are meant to be visible metadata. There's nothing *technically* stopping you do that though.
I'm not sure what you mean by the second part, but tags can exist for whatever word you choose to use. By using the word, you create the URL if it doesn't already exist. On 7/20/06, Thomas Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, okay, thanks, now I've got it. But this is just the technical part. What sense could it be to link to "tech" with the word "fish"? Does this not confuse the reader of the text? And does the technical rule not restrict to strong? There *has* to be an URL with the tag at the end. Is this possible in every case? regards, Thomas On 7/20/06, Ben O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The text of the link doesn't actually matter, the tag is taken from the URL. > So even though the text of the link is "fish" the tag is still "tech". > > Ben O'Neill > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas > Hofmann > Sent: 20 July 2006 09:31 .. > in the wiki under http://microformats.org/wiki/reltag I found: > > <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/tech"; rel="tag">fish</a> .. > I could think, that the link in the first tag should rather be: > > http://technorati.com/tag/fish _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Frances Berriman http://www.fberriman.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
