On 7/22/06 3:30 AM, "Ben Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 22 Jul 2006, at 03:15, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> should these all be in the FAQ? > > I think we should definitely have this covered on the Wiki; it seems > in the same spirit as dispelling the /. misconceptions last week.
Agreed. > Definitely worth getting this documented definitively, 'cause it > seems to be a very common misconception. Ok, here is a start, including the excellent summary from Sören: http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats-easier-than-xml http://microformats.org/wiki/semantic-xhtml http://microformats.org/wiki/semantic-class-names http://microformats.org/wiki/plain-old-xml-considered-harmful http://microformats.org/wiki/namespaces-considered-harmful Please feel free to expand upon these with material from earlier discussions etc. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
