On 8/24/06, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is another data model Google provides called the GData model which isn't compatible but allows for deeper structures.
I think that's my big issue... they keep releasing these APIs, which, on the one hand, is great... And it's good that they're using Atom. However, microformats seem a whole lot easier and a lower barrier to entry in many respects (though they'd have to get involved in the community process which may be too slow for them). At the very least, supporting both microformats and their own made up magical API would be a nice overture. IMHO. Heh. Chris
On 8/24/06, Chris Messina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WTF. > > http://code.google.com/apis/base/ > > It's like from outer space. But unreal. > > Chris > > -- > Chris Messina > Agent Provocateur, Citizen Agency & > Open Source Ambassador-at-Large > Work: http://citizenagency.com > Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog > Cell: 412 225-1051 > Skype: factoryjoe > This email is: [X] bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Chris Messina Agent Provocateur, Citizen Agency & Open Source Ambassador-at-Large Work: http://citizenagency.com Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog Cell: 412 225-1051 Skype: factoryjoe This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
