On 8/29/06, Tantek Çelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a good summary to date and deserving of being captured on the
citation-brainstorming page.
I agree. I think the fundmental last hump to get over is the choice
between a largely monolithic and flat BibTeX-like approach, and a more
modular and relational DC-like approach. The choice is crtiical
because it has significant implications to the flexibility of hCite.
On the nesting example, though, this would be the more typical case
(chapter in a book, rather than vice versa), and one could forego
typing:
<div class="hcite">
<div class=chapter">
<span class="title">Chapter Title</span>
<div class="isPartOf">
<span class="title">Book Title</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
To me typing is nice, but not critical, paricularly if the rest of the
data is sound.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
