On 8/31/06, Timothy Gambell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> hCard has a role term, though I don't know if it is consistent with > this? Certainly an appealing possibility. Unless the proprietors of hCard object, I think we should use it. Do you agree?
Well, the problem with role to me is the semantics are unclear (a role isn't really a property of a person, but a relation between a person and some other thing). But I really have no strong opinion.
> It is; really more a "producer". The DC group considers it a > contributor, and has wanted to get rid of dc:publisher and use that > instead. Dropping publisher and marking it up as a contributor with a role of publisher sounds like a good proposal to me.
I'm not saying to drop it really; just giving an example of how to think about it. Bruce _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
