1. you don't have to, it's bonus meta-info. 2. you can probably map cite-rel to Atom Threading Extensions - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.txt and get as good a coverage as you would from atom.
Eran. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:microformats- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Messina > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:14 PM > To: Microformats Discuss > Subject: Re: Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense? > > How would you handle nested comments like in Digg for example? > > Just curious how that fits into the model -- I suppose it would map to > what you described? > > Chris > > On 9/11/06, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Steph, > > > > Le 12 sept. 06 à 07:17, Stephanie Booth (bunny) a écrit : > > > A while back somebody showed me a blog marked up with hatom. That > > > person used hatom on the comments too (on the single post page) -- > > > that meant two hfeeds: one containing only the post, and another one > > > with the comments. > > > > > > Does this way of using hatom on comments make sense to you? I noticed > > > that neither K2 nor Sandbox wordpress themes do this. > > > > Completely logical. > > > > Each individual comment is nothing more than a weblog post. > > The only technical difference is that it is not made on another > > weblog, but directly on the weblog of the person. > > > > Each individual comment is structured like a weblog post. > > It has (required) > > - an id, the URI of the comment > > - a title, often the same than the original weblog post, > sometimes a > > different (see SPIP) > > - a date when it has been done (updated) > > It has (recommended) > > - often an author > > - content (core text of the comment) > > - link (the URI of the Weblog original post we are commenting > on) > > > > It just miss a summary, but that is not mandatory in Atom either. > > > > IMHO, it should be an individual hatom entry for each comment, The > > way everything is aggregated and organized has a full feed is another > > debate. The date and link should help to create a pseudo thread. > > It could be a full thread like in SPIP when the commenter has the > > possibility to reply to a specific comment in this case the link > > becomes the URI of the specific comment. > > > > > > > > -- > > Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > > W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead > > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ > > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > microformats-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Citizen Provocateur & > Open Source Ambassador-at-Large > Work: http://citizenagency.com > Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog > Cell: 412 225-1051 > Skype: factoryjoe > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
