In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Casciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> I propose "luna" and "mars" microformats >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/luna-examples> >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/mars-examples> >I guess i have two questions in an effort to move things along a bit... Thank you. >- do we really need a /different/ microformat for every body being >described? is there a way to add a third value for type (or body, or >something more appropriate) to geo without breaking exiting spec / >rules or muddying things up too much? I did consider that, but I'm not sure how one could attach the extra attribute, I also considered "geo-luna" and "geo-mars"; but the meaning of "geo" is "(planet) Earth", so it's not really appropriate. I suppose we could have gone for: class="coordinates" type="geo" class="coordinates" type="luna" class="coordinates" type="mars" but it's too late, now. >- how is this data reused now, if at all. Looking at the wikipedia >external links it seems the data for the moon landing example all seem >to blow up because they're trying to plot you on the earth instead.. >(e.g. yahoo puts you in the middle of the pacific ocean). Which external links? -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
