In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>I could possibly be convinced to write such a Greasemonkey script, but >I currently suspect it would end up being more annoying than useful. >For example, here's a clipping from the second (first English) live >example in the wiki for hCalendar [1]: > ><th scope="row">Tuesday 12<br> ><abbr class="dtstart" title="2006-09-12T19:30:00+01:00">7:30</ >abbr>–<abbr class="dtend" title="2006-09-12T21:30:00 >+01:00">9:30</abbr>pm</th> > >That displays as: > >Tuesday 12 >7:30–9:30pm > >By auto-converting the ISO8601 dates to my preferred format, that >would display as: > >Tuesday 12 >September 12, 2006 7:30pm–September 12, 2006 9:30pm > >I prefer the original, and I suspect this is more the norm than the >exception. > >[1] http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/diary/2006-09.htm Interesting - that's one of my pages. Can you suggest a better way to mark-up the event? I could use: <th scope="row"> <abbr class="dtstart" title="2006-09-12T19:30:00+01:00"> Tuesday 12<br>7:30 </abbr> – <abbr class="dtend" title="2006-09-12T21:30:00+01:00"> 9:30 </abbr>pm </th> which would solve your issue, but why should "Tuesday 12" be inside the dtstart and not dtend? Or is the original premise: In the future one could imagine a CSS rule and perhaps a CSS property or two that would automatically transform and present [...] ISO8601 dates from 'title' attributes of <abbr> elements into whatever datetime format the user preferred rather than my mark-up, at fault? -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
