Why aren't we looking for an established format to fulfill our 80/20 requirement and become a
good 1:1 scope?

BibTex does authors like this,

@article {
  Author = {Vicente, Kim J. and Rasmussen, Jens}
  ...
}

While EndNote does it like this:

<record>
  <contributors>
    <authors>
      <author>Vicente, Kim J.</author>
      <author>Rasmussen, Jens</author>
    </authors>
  </contributors>
  ...
</record>

BibDesk[1] also exports the following:

<dd class="Pub">
  <span class="Author">Vicente, Kim J. and Rasmussen, Jens<span>
  ...
</dd>

Perhaps instead of wheel reinvention, we should look to one of these well-used citation formats. Is there any reason why neither BibTex nor EndNote fields are listed in the citation-examples page of the wiki? They seem the closest thing to what we're looking for, i.e. BibTex could be to hCite what vCard is to hCard. Blithely creating our own format seems reckless and doomed to
obscurity.

[1]: http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/

--
Ryan Cannon

Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com



On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:00 PM, "Michael McCracken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 9/22/06, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/22/06, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

That is the most straightforward way, yes. The problem I have with it is the repeated role term will be displayed for every contributor, and
will likely end up being more hidden data.

No, I'm saying have two main terms: creator and contributor.

Only add a role when it actually needs to be displayed (which is not
the case for an author). Using creator for author is fine.

So you're saying that for the common case where creator is clear
enough, it'd look like this:

<span class="citation">
  <span class="creator vcard">author1</span>
  <span class="creator vcard">author2</span>
  <span class="title"> article title</span>
...
</span>

And then only use 'role' where necessary to clear things up?

I like that, and now I see where you said it earlier, but I missed it then.

This sounds like a good solution. What does everyone else think?

Also, what's the next issue to resolve before we can put out a draft?
-mike

--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/


_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to