On Sep 23, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
People use the vernacular AND taxonomic names of species in everyday
speech and writing - just read or watch any populist gardening
magazine
or television programme.
We're only concerned with examples on the web. The *-examples page
is part of the process specifically to avoid this kind of potentially
endless subjective disagreement. It would be much more productive to
focus this discussion on the specific examples we've documented
rather than vague concepts of an "average person."
In fact, I'll wager that they do so far more
than they use 8-digit geo-spatial references, but that doesn't stop us
using "geo".
I agree that geo is not currently very widely published on the web,
and if it were suggested as it's own microformat, it probably
wouldn't be adopted. But it was adopted as part of hCard, so the
choice was between keeping hCard a 1:1 mapping of the widely used
vCard format, or creating a new format composed of vCard - geo (and
everything else few people use in vCard). I think it's pretty clear
the 1:1 mapping has significantly improved adoption of hCard. And
without wide adoption, there's no point in making a microformat. A
microformat only a few people are using is just semantic HTML with a
lot of wasted research behind it.
With adoption in mind, I recommend answering any questions about
potential microformats the same way you intend to answer the same
questions in the future when they're coming from potential adopters.
With an expressed interest in microformats, everyone on this list is
a potential adopter. And treating concerns as fodder for debate
doesn't strike me as an effective way to encourage adoption.
Peace,
Scott
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
