On Oct 2, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Colin
Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin
Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Andy, you're missing the point.
No, I'm not.
If
If
That's not a point, that's a conditional conjecture.
We don't
Who don't?
Instead of criticizing the structure of his argument, why not reply
to
the content?
Perhaps you missed th fact that I did.
Minimally, at best.
"No I'm not," is, I suppose, criticizing the content, yes, but not in
a constructive, or useful way. If you can't do this, then just don't
post.
"That's not a point, that's a conditional conjecture." Structural
argument. Again, completely unhelpful to anyone. See above.
"Who don't?" Your pedantry is becoming quite grating. If something is
unclear, it's fine to point it out, but then you could go on after
making a logical assumption about what he meant.
I don't think I'm the only person on this list who is more than a
little annoyed by your antics as of late. I have no problem with your
ideas, and I think many of them are useful. However, you seem to be
very resistant to debating things with others, which is the entire
point of this list. If everyone on this list behaved the way you do,
we would be spewing "No I don't"s "Yes you do"s at each other until we
were blue in the face.
Disgruntledly yours,
-Colin
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
