On 10/5/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's next?
Just keep working through the process: that is, if you're comfortable with the examples you've accumlated about how species is used on the web, brainstorm (which I see you've done), throw together a strawman uF, then say "this should be an offical microformat proposal". Then expect it to revised. It will be, over and over. An aside: My concern with what you've done so far is that you're carving out a fairly large amount of namespace for a fairly niche application (yes, what isn't outside of its domain). "class", for example, is already used in vCard and current policy is one-name one-meaning. Even though there's a policy of avoiding namespacing, we ended up doing that to a small degree in hAtom with entry-summary, entry-title and entry-content because the "deep meaning" of those items were so tied up into the particular problem domain. Regards, etc... David _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
