I find it's a lot easier to follow one list rather than three... but perhaps that's just me.
On 10/14/06, Bob Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about microformats-new , along with an open microformats-dev, and keep microformats- discuss for existing, established microformats. microformats-dev could mean "the development of new microformats"; perhaps microformats-applications would be a better name... --Bob. This is what Tantek Çelik <[email protected]> said about "Re: [uf-discuss] Idea: beginners/ge" on 14 Oct 2006 at 12:25 > In the spirit of simplest solution first, why not start with just *one* new > list for new microformats? > > I think "propose" is too limiting because there is a lot more involved in > the development of new microformats than just proposals (in fact, the more > important parts are *not* the proposal). > > I like the suggestions of opening up microformats-dev as well. > > Anybody else on the list have thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Tantek > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- - Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer <http://www.awriterz.org> MSN/GTalk/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ/AIM: 103332966 NSA: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
