On 10/16/06 10:38 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just been introducing a colleague to the concept of hCalendar; and > referred her to: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hCalendar > > She was baffled; not lest because, though the page had a treatise on > "Semantic XHTML Design Principles", it didn't list the hCalendar fields, > let alone say which are mandatory and which are optional! > > I have started to rewrite the page, but welcome contributions. Andy, it is actually a bit inappropriate to jump-in and rewrite a spec that is that well established without at least discussing how to rewrite it first, or emailing the editor at a minimum. There has already been work towards making the specifications more readable/approachable etc. and I've documented this task on the to-do page here. http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#update_specification_section_organization I'm going to revert the reorganizational changes you made to both hCard and hCalendar for now, and would ask that you please refrain from doing so single-handedly. Please raise suggestions here on the list first and let's discuss them. For established specifications in particular (and perhaps any with an "editor"), we really should respect that role until/unless it actually proves to be a hindrance (which it hasn't so far). Thanks much for your understanding, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
