On 10/18/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> but beware of the costs of creating "reserved"/"manditory" structures.
Can you elaborate? Maybe with examples?
My thoughts were along the same line as Karl's in this post.
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-October/006469.html
Once Paths are declared and "reserved" then they are no longer
available for anyone else to use because there is an 'assumed' usage
already.
For example.
http://example.org/robots.txt
http://example.org/favicon.ico
http://example.org/p3p/
If sony ever came out with a Play Station Portable 3, (p3p maybe) that
URI with /p3p/ would NOT resolve to the expected privacy information,
but to a product page.
(http://www.google.com/search?&q=inurl:p3p&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8)
That was all i was attempting to point out, that by imposing a
structure, you might be breaking other things.
Just a thought.
-brian
--
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
